Infographics (Page 18 of 24)

yep, I thinks the movie was called Dracula and the boys/Does Dracula really sucks. See also : [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYzYaRWT … r_embedded[/youtube]

http://www.thomson.co.uk/blog/wp-conten … index.html

Very funny. Not only my pocket knows this, my backpacks and such too.

http://www.partselect.com/JustForFun/Ap … raphic.htm

a project i was working on recently
contain infographics and maps
http://bcove.me/m7gnsf7q

finally get to contribute! huzzah!

that's a perfect example of how you can prove just about anything with a graph

jeesus, goldman is one of the largest (& most succesful) banks around so a lot of people in the finance industry are bound to have worked there at some point. by picking the ones that have got something to do with the EU doesn't prove anything. i bet they all, at some point in their lives, smoked ganja. so is ganja now the PILLUMINATI?

see my quote above:

I second heifetz's eloquent prognosis... there are tons of people in charge of various government institutions that are in charge of fiscal policy, therefore it's not hard to search through the list to find connections with big money business.

In other words linking a handful of people to Goldman Sachs is statistically irrelevant. Come back with hard numbers involving all current fiscal government employees... AND former ones too (since that list counts them as well). heh.

Here's my contribution to this thread:

If you really cared to trace Goldman's cozy relationship with Govt. you'd have to go back to like 1907 or earlier. Pass. Not really why I joined up. But just take a sample of the current US Treassury. That should tell you plenty. Finance is all about reputation and Goldman's reek of fraud at best.

That was the point of the graphic, to illustrate CURRENT Goldman alumni in positions of power across Europe. To say having people from this school in positions of power is irrelevant might be a disservice to people living in those countries.

But hooray for the entertainment biz.